Selected Work

Four Case Studies

Four procurement and supply-chain governance engagements — the problem as it actually presented, what I did, and what measurably changed. Delivered remotely across GCC time zones.

Free PDF

Get all four as a downloadable PDF

Read them right here on this page — or leave your email and I'll send the full set straight to your inbox to keep.

Case Study 01 · Dubai, UAE

Multi-Site Operational & Procurement Diagnostic

Three warehouses, one blind spot each.

The problem

A Dubai-based investment group spanning e-commerce, distribution and import, AED 100M+ revenue, 150 employees, was running three separate GCC warehouses and logistics hubs, each one grown somewhat independently. Nobody had a single, current picture of how vendor performance, slotting, or carrier mix compared across the three, or where the real inefficiency was actually hiding.

What I did

Ran a full operational and procurement diagnostic across all three sites in parallel, rather than treating each warehouse as its own island. Compared vendor performance, slotting logic, and carrier mix side by side, then used what surfaced to build a single prioritized remediation plan leadership could act on, not a generic audit report nobody reads. Separately, integrated procurement and order data between the company's e-commerce platform, ERP, and warehouse management system, closing a gap where orders were being manually re-keyed between systems, quietly distorting the spend numbers leadership was using to make decisions.

The result

A prioritized, cross-site remediation plan covering vendor performance, slotting, and carrier mix. Real-time spend visibility restored by removing the manual re-keying step that had been feeding leadership bad numbers without anyone realizing it.

If your organization runs more than one site, warehouse, or hub, and each has slowly developed its own way of doing things, the real cost usually isn't any single site's inefficiency. It's the invisible inconsistency between them — the thing nobody sees until someone looks at all three side by side, at once.

Case Study 02

Warehouse Systems Advisory

The system says one thing. The shelf says another.

The problem

A 3-site warehouse network was reporting confident, stable inventory numbers. Operationally, though, stockouts kept happening against stock the system swore was available, and nobody could explain the gap.

What I found

A full physical count against the system's own numbers showed inventory accuracy at 67 percent, across more than 7,800 SKUs. Almost a third of what the system reported simply wasn't there.

What I did

Deployed SAP Extended Warehouse Management across all three sites in eight months. Rebuilt the process around scanner-verified picks, so the system physically cannot confirm a pick it can't verify, and real cycle counts on a real schedule, not an annual scramble nobody believed.

The result

Inventory accuracy rose to 98 percent. Picking errors fell from 5–6 to 1–2 per 1,000 lines. On-time-in-full delivery held at 99 percent across 7 distribution points for 9 consecutive months.

If your team can't tell you, with confidence, what's actually on the shelf right now, this is usually the fastest and most measurable fix available, and it tends to pay for itself within the same fiscal year.

Case Study 03

Procurement Governance Diagnostic

Spend with nothing in place to question it.

The problem

An annual procurement spend base of roughly $54M had no tendering discipline, no supplier scorecards, and no variance reporting. Cost decisions were being made on habit and existing relationships, not competition or data.

What I did

Built the governance infrastructure from zero. Competitive tendering. Specification rationalization. A tender committee that actually met. Supplier scorecards. A monthly spend-variance review that reached executive leadership.

The result

Annual cost cut by 10 percent, roughly $5.4M, within 12 months, without cutting a single legitimate requirement. The saving didn't come from harder negotiating. It came from installing a system that could catch what was already being overpaid.

Most organizations at this spend level are sitting on a comparable percentage of recoverable cost. The gap is rarely the vendor's price. It's the absence of a system that would ever question it.

Case Study 04

Cross-Border Supplier Qualification

One bad month from a single supplier.

The problem

A growing import business was sourcing core catalogue items from just two suppliers, both in the same country. One quality issue, price spike, or shipping delay could stall the entire supply chain, with no real fallback.

What I did

Built a structured supplier qualification process — evaluation criteria, vetting, staged onboarding — and used it to diversify the supplier base from 2 to 9 qualified vendors.

The result

Single-source exposure removed entirely. Sustained price competition created across the core catalogue. What had been a fragile dependency became a negotiating advantage.

If your sourcing strategy depends on one supplier relationship holding up perfectly and indefinitely, that isn't a strategy. It's a bet. This is what replaces it.

Where these came from: 30 years across military logistics, public-sector procurement, and commercial operations in the UAE, Pakistan, and the GCC. Engagements delivered remotely across the region.